Skip to content
SignalPowered bySign inBack to Digirockstars
Back to Signal

iGaming

PAGCOR Caps Slot Cash Rebates at 1.40% and Bars GGR Deductions. What Operators Should Check

PAGCOR now limits slot player incentives at licensed land-based casinos to 1.50% of turnover, with no more than 1.40% in cash. The same rule bars deducting rebates and commissions when computing GGR.

Roland Cinco 4 min read

This brief is supported by

WOMO (opens in a new tab)More about them at the end of the brief

Signal Spotlight · PAGCOR slot incentive rules for land-based casinos

What happened

According to AGBrief, GGRAsia and Focus Gaming News, PAGCOR's board approved the amendments on 8 October 2026. A notice to licensed casinos dated 13 October says they take effect with immediate effect, on publication on PAGCOR's website. Coverage appeared on 14 and 15 October.

The slot cap. Total incentives for slot players are limited to 1.50% of turnover. Up to 1.40% can be a cash rebate. The rest is an "incentive commission", capped at 0.20% within the 1.50% total, and it cannot be redeemed for cash. For slots, the cap is measured on turnover, not net turnover, per AGBrief.

Tables are unchanged. The existing limits stay at 1.35% of net turnover for non-junket VIP and high-roller players and 1.50% for junket players. AGBrief says the amendments add a slot machine category to the player incentive provisions of the land-based casino manual.

GGR treatment. AGBrief quotes the notice as saying such incentives "shall not be included as a deduction in the computation of gross gaming revenues." Focus Gaming News reports that casinos cannot treat incentives, including rebates and rolling commissions, as table or electronic gaming machine losses to reduce reported GGR.

Implementation. PAGCOR said the changes will be incorporated into Revision No. 1 of the Casino Regulatory Manual for Licensed Land-Based Casinos, per Focus Gaming News.

What the coverage does not say

No grace period is described. The sources we read do not mention one, and they do not say how existing rebate arrangements should be unwound. "Immediate effect" is the notice's wording. We did not see the notice itself.

No reason is given. None of the articles quotes PAGCOR on why it acted, or gives a circular number.

The effect on fees is not stated. The reports do not say how the GGR change affects licence fees or other charges that are calculated on GGR. That is a question for PAGCOR and for your finance team.

It is separate from the online rules. In May, PAGCOR set a 1.50% cap on cash rebates and cashback for online gaming, measured against turnover or deposits. The land-based rule is a different instrument.

Why it matters

The signal is that PAGCOR is now setting numbers on slot incentives, not only on tables. Operators with slot rebate programmes above the new levels have to change them. The structure also matters: only part of the allowance can be cash, so a programme built around cash rebates has less room than the 1.50% figure suggests.

The GGR clause is easy to miss. If incentives can no longer be netted off, the reported figure for slots moves closer to the amount before incentives are paid. This is our reading of the notice as quoted, and it is worth confirming with PAGCOR how it applies in practice.

For context, the cap sits next to a soft slot market at one major property. Okada Manila's machine revenue fell 4.0% in the third quarter even as handle rose 5.6%, according to GGRAsia. We found nothing linking the rule to Okada's results, and the two should not be read as connected.